Sunday, March 24, 2019

Brown Vs.Board Of Education :: essays research papers

Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954) (USSC+)347 U.S. 483Argued December 9, 1952Reargued December 8, 1953Decided May 17, 1954 magical spell FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS*SyllabusSegregation of livid and Negro children in the public schools of a State solely on the ass of race, pursuant to state laws permitting or requiring such segregation, denies to Negro children the jibe protection of the laws guaranteed by the fourteenth Amendment -- even though the physical facilities and former(a) " tactual" factors of white and Negro schools may be equal.(a) The history of the Fourteenth Amendment is inconclusive as to its intended effect on public education.(b) The headspring presented in these cases must be determined not on the basis of conditions existing when the Fourteenth Amendment was follow, but in the light of the full culture of public education and its present place in American brio throughout the Nation.(c) Where a Sta te has undertaken to provide an opportunity for an education in its public schools, such an opportunity is a right which must be made available to all on equal terms.(d) Segregation of children in public schools solely on the basis of race takes children of the minority aggroup of equal educational opportunities, even though the physical facilities and opposite "tangible" factors may be equal.(e) The "separate but equal" doctrine adopted in Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537, has no place in the field of public education.(f) The cases be restored to the docket for further argument on specified questions relating to the forms of the decrees.Opinion warrenMR. CHIEF JUSTICE WARREN delivered the opinion of the accost.These cases come to us from the States of Kansas, south Carolina, Virginia, and Delaware. They are premised on different facts and different local conditions, but a common legal question justifies their consideration together in this amalgamate opinion. In each of the cases, minors of the Negro race, through their legal representatives, explore the aid of the courts in obtaining admission to the public schools of their community on a nonsegregated basis. In each instance, they had been denied admission to schools attended by white children under laws requiring or permitting segregation according to race. This segregation was alleged to deprive the plaintiffs of the equal protection of the laws under the Fourteenth Amendment. In each of the cases other than the Delaware case, a three-judge federal district court denied relief to the plaintiffs on the alleged(prenominal) "separate but equal" doctrine announced by this Court in Plessy v.

No comments:

Post a Comment