The death penalty is not a deterrent Research Paper - 1

The terminal penalty is not a deterrent - Research melodic theme ExamplePillsbury vied that it is the violence of our crimes that is the problem and not the number of crimes. And in dealing with the the Statesn homicide problem, we need to cuddle it squ bely with all the help we can muster from social scientists, lawyers, police officeholders, community leader and activists, even out novelists and movie makers. Each of these people provides a different perspective on what makes people pull out crime, and to each(prenominal) one provides a different solution in dealing with the criminal who committed the crime. (Pillsbury 3) A police officer who apprehended the criminal may expect conviction and incarceration. The psychiatrist may ask for psychiatric treatment, art object a social reformer may ask that the offender be given family support which he/she lacked when the crime was committed. Each professional or actor in the justice system may want a different approach. But thi s will hold only for as long as each respects the other. The criminal, after a psychiatric treatment, may find himself a promoter of social reform, only not capital punishment. This paper will provide an answer to the question whether the criminal deserves punishment and not the finish penalty. Is capital punishment a deterrent to a convicts commission of other crime? Or is it a deterrent for others to commit a crime? Literature Review Proponents of the death penalty provide four fundamental rationales in imposing it deterrence, instrumental perspective, retribution, and incapacitation (Lambert and Clarke, qtd. in Elechi, Lambert and Ventura 110). Proponents argue that people can be stopped from committing crimes by imposing severe sanctions and executing criminals deters others who planned to commit crimes from doing so. Proponents also advocate that the death penalty is an effective deterrent than life imprisonment (Elechi et al 110). payback is vengeance (Mitchell 480). Stati stics closely homicide rates in conjunction with execution rates Since 1999 the murder rate has remained same(predicate) despite the decline of death sentences, executions, and the size of death row. (Death Penalty Information Center para. 1) In the so-called execution capital of the nation, Texas, executions go up the same thing with homicide. For example in Bexar, San Antonio, with a population of about 1.4 million, the murder rate is 14.91, executions registered at 18 and executions per 1,000 murders are 4.3 in El Paso, a population of .7 million, the murder rate is 6.60, execution 1 in Tarrant (Ft. Worth), population of 1.5, murder rate is 12.78, executions 22, and executions per 1,000 are 6.5 in Dallas, a population of 2.2 million, the murder rate is 19.33, executions 26, and executions per 1000 murders are 3.1. The hiatus in executions during 1972 to 1976 was brought about by the Supreme Courts ruling in Furman v. Georgia, which states that capital punishment in America was cruel and unusual punishment. (Mortal Justice The Demography of the Death Penalty 40) Statistics about homicide rates in conjunction with life imprisonment States, which do not prevail the death penalty and only have life imprisonment, have reported lower murder rates. In 2010, the murder rate in death penalty states was 5.00, while the murder rate in non-death penalty states was 4.01 or a difference of 25%. In other words, death penalty or life imprisonment has no deterrence on violent crimes like murder. The murder rate is calculated by dividing the total